The Surveys are then done, the borders of the
land are defined by the survey and the plat. This is sometimes homesteaded at this point. ● Link to Book: Forest Technology: A suggested 2-year Post High School Curriculum, Volume 80054 (1968) https://books.google.com/books/about/Forest_Technology.html?id=Q8z_RQAACAAJ&hl=en On (page 2) of this excerpt: 9-3. The legal significance of plat and field notes is set out in Alaska United Gold Mining Co. v. Cincinnati-Alaska Mining Co., 45 L.D. 330 (1916). It has been repeatedly held by both State and Federal courts that plats and field notes referred to in patents may be resorted to for the purpose of determining the limits of the area that passed under such patents. In the case of Cragin v. Powell (128 U.S. 691, 696), the Supreme Court said: "It is a well settled principle that when lands are granted according to an official plat of the survey of such lands, the plat itself, with all its notes, lines, descriptions and landmarks, become as much a part of the grant or deed by which they are conveyed, and controls so far as limits are concerned, as if such descriptive features were written out upon the face of the deed or the grant itself." ● Metes and Bounds for States (60 page PDF) Link to Book: Restoration of lost or obliterated corners and subdivision sections - lost_oblit.pdf http://www.blm.gov/or/gis/geoscience/files/lost_oblit.pdf (this link will download a 45 page PDF) IMPORTANCE OF PLAT AND FIELD NOTES (Pg. 10) The importance, or legal significance, of the plats and field notes is well stated in an opinion by the Department of the Interior (45 L. D. 330, 336) as follows: It has been repeatedly held by both State and Federal courts that plats and field notes referred to in patents may be resorted to for the purpose of determining the limits of the area that passed under such patents. In the case of Cragin v. Powell (128 U.S. 691, 696), the Supreme Court said: "It is a well settled principal that when lands are granted according to an official plat of the survey of such lands, the plat itself, with all its notes, lines, descriptions, and landmarks, becomes as much a part of the grant or deed by which they are conveyed, and controls so far as limits are concerned, as if such descriptive features were written out upon the face of the deed or the grant itself." Speaking of surveys I read in those compacts of the 1990’s it said that the U.S. wanted: “Commissioning a survey of the entire 116-mile stretch of contested area along the Red River using the gradient boundary survey method developed and backed by the Supreme Court to find the proper boundary between private and federally owned land.” Well this may/could present a problem since the original surveys were done using the ole chain and rods method. The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that unless there was gross error or fraud found in the original surveys subsequent surveys can not change or alter the property rights established by the original surveys. The U.S. Dept. of Interior knows this, and in fact has issued administrative hearings on this subject over the past 125+ years plus, the BLM knows this fact as well but, refuses to abide by the law since it doesn’t suit its new purpose in life. One needs to find out if the Republic of Texas followed the survey procedures that were practiced in the U.S. prior to entering the Union, and if so, what U.S. Surveyor General Manual(s) of Instructions did they use? Also, the same needs to be found out after admittance into the Union. There were important changes from Manual to Manual especially concerning inland lakes, rivers and streams. It is most important to document surveys:
[B] plain wording of the statute and the legislative intent, [C] a recent [2014] U.S. Supreme Court decision stating same, [D] that once patent has issued the government no longer has jurisdiction and, cannot be changed by subsequent legislation. While this case pertains to lands conveyed out of the national public domain by an Act of congress the same rules would apply to lands conveyed out of a state’s public domain by a state’s legislative act. We know that the state legislature believes it can create whatever laws it wants for whatever reasons, or lack thereof, it can’t by law; constitutional, common law and contract. The DNR & DEQ has been empowered by the EPA to enforce the federal Clean Waters Act but the EPA is part of the federal executive branch and Congress no longer has jurisdiction of the lands conveyed by patent, barring any reservations, supported by numerous rulings by the federal Supreme Court. While numerous departments of the federal executive branch have been surveying, categorizing, indexing and classifying private property in which the original titles come from a previous sovereign nation or the federal government itself none of those dept. have any jurisdiction to do so or, impose any land use restriction and claim of interest of whatever kind. Also, Came across is case in Title 43 U.S.C.A., Sec. 15 Ch. 1 Bureau of Land Management, I. Generally, 1. Law Governing "Where the United States has not in any way provided otherwise, the ordinary incidents attaching to a title traced to a patent under the public land laws may be determined according to local rules, provided such rules do not impair the efficacy of the grant or the use and enjoyment of the property by the grantee." Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas v U.S., 260 U.S. 77 In this particular case it is stated that it is federal rules which determine whether or not a body of water is navigable or not, not state or local rules to make such determination. The gist of the Brown v NHRRA is quoted here: Note the government loses its jurisdiction over the land as soon as a valid patent is issued. [¶ 13.] The Beres court emphasized that the landowners' successors in interest had derived title from a land patent. The court noted that a land patent that is "regular in form and for whose issuance there is statutory authority is so binding on the government that a purchaser from the patentee need make no investigation as to the details of its issuance the legal title has passed and the patent is conclusive against the government. The [government] *737 loses its jurisdiction over the land as soon as a valid patent is issued." Id. at 417 (quoting U.S. v. Eaton Shale Co., 433 F.Supp. 1256, 1267 (D.Colo.1977)) (alteration in the original). The land patent to Beres' land failed to reserve an interest by the United States. Id. Consequently, the court concluded that the United States failed to retain an interest in the ROW. The court reasoned as follows:
[T]he United States Supreme Court recognizes the
sanctity of land transfers, and has expressed reluctance to interfere with
land rights in which no reservations were present when conferred, stating
that: "Generations of land patents have issued without any express reservation
of the right now claimed by the Government. . . . [W]e are unwilling to upset
settled expectations to accommodate some ill defined power to construct public
thoroughfares without compensation." https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/901624/brown-v-nhrra/ Here’s a pretty dang good explanation of the Color of Title Act which came into being in 1928. Over the years everyone found out, usually the hard way of course, that not all of the public domain lands had actually been properly or even surveyed as per the then existing U.S. Surveyor General’s Manual of Instructions to conduct surveys which the down in the dirt surveyors were supposed to follow. The old human nature again. For those property owners whose original title came from a previous sovereign nation they had anywhere from several, too many years, to present their titles to the U.S. Land Commissioners for inspection/review, and to have surveys done to actually physically locate the borders of the land so described within the patents/grants. A great many of these property owners failed to get off their behinds within the allotted time. Hence, the reason for the Color of Title Act. If you Google ‘U.S. Color of Title Act’ you’ll get a snoot full of hits. Here is one from Texas Attorney General Opinion_JM-364 Current Texas Statutes:
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 53. Special Act or Law CV - Vernon's Civil Statutes, Title 86. - Lands--public, Ch. 6. - Patents § 2.. The State of Texas hereby relinquishes, quit-claims and grants to patentees and awardees and their assignees all of the lands, and minerals therein contained, lying across, or partly across watercourses or navigable streams, which lands are included in surveys heretofore made, and to which lands patents or awards have been issued and outstanding for a period of ten years from the date thereof and have not been cancelled or forfeited, and the State of Texas hereby relinquishes, quit-claims and grants to patentees and awardees and their assignees all of the beds, and minerals therein contained, or water courses or navigable streams, and also all of the abandoned beds, and minerals therein contained, of water courses or navigable streams, which beds or abandoned beds or parts thereof are included in surveys heretofore made, and to which beds or abandoned beds, or parts thereof, patents or awards have been issued and outstanding for a period of ten years from the date thereof, and have not been cancelled or forfeited; provided that nothing in this Act contained shall impair the rights of the general public and the State in the waters of streams or the rights of riparian and appropriation owners in the waters of such streams, and provided further that with respect to lands sold by the State of Texas expressly reserving title to minerals in the State, such reservation shall not be affected by this Act; nor shall relinquish or quit-claim any number of acres of land in excess of the number of acres of land conveyed to said patentee or awardees in the original patents granted by the State, but the patentees or awardees and their assignees shall have the same rights, title and interest in the minerals in the beds or abandoned beds, or parts thereof, of such water courses or navigable streams, that they have in the uplands covered by the same patent or award; provided that this Act shall not in any way affect the State's title, right or interests in and to the sand and gravel, lying within the bed of any navigable stream within this State, as defined by Article 5302, Revised Statutes of 1925. CV - Vernon's Civil Statutes, Title 86. - Lands--public, Ch. 7. - General Provisions, Art. 5421c-6.. Patents Validated. All patents issued prior to the effective date of Article 5421-c as amended by House Bill No. 9 of the Forty-sixth Legislature, such effective date being September 21, 1939, by the authority of the State, under the seal of the State and of the Land Office, signed by the Governor and countersigned by the Commissioner of the General Land Office to parties who for a period of ten (10) years prior to the date of application for the patent had held and claimed the same in good faith, under the provisions of Section 5 of Chapter 271, Acts of the Forty-second Legislature, Regular Session, are hereby ratified and title validated and confirmed in such patentees, their heirs or assigns, subject only to the mineral reservation as contained in Section 4, Chapter 271, Acts of the Forty-second Legislature, Regular Session, and without regard to whether or not such land was located within five (5) miles of a well producing oil or gas in commercial quantities at the time of such patent. Acts 1943, 48th Leg., p. 368, ch. 247, Sec. 1. CV - Vernon's Civil Statutes, Title 86. - Lands--public, Ch. 6. - Patents All patents to and awards of lands lying across or partly across water courses or navigable streams and all patents and awards covering or including the beds or abandoned beds of water courses or navigable streams or parts thereof, which patents or awards have been issued and outstanding for a period of ten years from the date thereof and have not been cancelled or forfeited, are hereby confirmed and validated. § 3..Any claimant to any portion of said lands who would have had title to same had it been located in Oklahoma, may make application to the Commissioner of the General Land Office to purchase the land claimed. Such application shall be accompanied by field notes of the tract claimed, together with a filing fee of One ($1.00) Dollar, an examination fee of Fifteen (.15¢) Cents per acre, and with such other information as the Land Board may require to be given, including certified copies of all muniments of title under the laws of Oklahoma. Upon receipt of such application the Land Board shall cause an investigation to be made as to the status of the public records of the State of Oklahoma, and in event it is found that the applicant would have been the owner of said land at the time of the decree of the Supreme Court of the United States had the same been located in Oklahoma, or holds title by reason of foreclosure of a lien valid and enforceable under the laws of Oklahoma at the time of such decree of the Supreme Court of the United States, such application shall be approved, and said land awarded to said applicant. Within sixty days after such award such applicant shall pay to the Commissioner of the General Land Office the sum of One ($1.00) Dollar per acre for said land, and upon receipt of such payment the Commissioner of the General Land Office shall issue to the claimant a patent to said lands in such form as the Land Commissioner shall prescribe. § 4..In event the claimant fails or refuses to purchase same or to apply for a patent as provided for herein, then the holder of a lien against any of said lands may make such purchase or apply for such patent on behalf of said owner and pay the consideration provided for, and all fees and expenses, and such amounts when paid by such lien holder shall be added to and become a part of the total amount secured by the lien. A failure on the part of the said owner to make purchase, or application for patent, for a period of four months after the last publication by said Land Board as provided in this Act shall constitute such failure to apply as will warrant the lien holder in making such application to purchase. The patent issued upon application and purchase of a lien holder shall be in the name of the person, persons or company who would have owned said lands had the same been a part of Oklahoma. Recording Deeds, Mortgages, Etc.; Evidence; Force and Effect § 5..All deeds, mortgages, contracts and instruments of every nature, or in case of loss of any such instrument a certified copy from the record in the Oklahoma County may be so used, affecting the title to said lands, or that would have formed a part of the chain of title to the same under the laws of the State of Oklahoma, and now of record on the public records of the State of Oklahoma, may be filed and recorded in the county in Texas in which the land is now located. All deeds, mortgages, conveyances and all other instruments which would be valid under the laws of the State of Oklahoma and admissible in evidence under the laws of said State, shall be valid in Texas and shall be admissible in evidence in any court in this State, and copies of said instruments certified as provided by the laws of Oklahoma, as well as the originals thereof, may be introduced in evidence in the same manner as if executed with the formalities required by the laws of the State of Texas, and as if certified as required by the laws of this State. All such deeds, deeds of trust, mortgages, conveyances and contracts, affecting the title to any of said lands shall be given the same force and effect in the State of Texas as same would have been given in the State of Oklahoma, and all bona fide liens, incumbrances, or debentures, now outstanding and unsatisfied, and existing against said lands at the time of the rendition of said decision of the Supreme Court of the United States are here expressly validated, save and except as to purchase money due to the State of Oklahoma, or the United States, and except taxes, general or special, due to the State of Oklahoma, or any city, county, school district or other political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma. In determining whether any lien against said land shall be enforced, the period of time intervening between the rendition of the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States and the issuance of a patent to the land involved by the State of Texas, shall not be computed in applying the Statutes of Limitation of either the State of Oklahoma or the State of Texas, and this Act shall be liberally construed in the enforcement of liens against said land, it being the intention of the Legislature that all sections and parts hereof are independent of each other, and if any section or part hereof be held unconstitutional such invalid section shall not affect the remaining sections or parts hereof. Deposit and Use of Fees
OWNERSHIP OF BEDS OF NAVIGABLE STREAMS
STATE OWNERSHIP IN TRUST FOR THE PUBLIC
STATE OWNERSHIP OF PERENNIAL STREAMS UNDER THE CIVIL LAW
THE SMALL BILL
DAMS AND THE SMALL BILL
NAVIGATION RIGHTS IRRESPECTIVE OF OWNERSHIP 9 Bible Verses relating to what God says about Survey Markers / Landmarks Most Relevant Verses
Proverbs 22:28 Verse Concepts: "You shall not move your neighbor's boundary mark, which the ancestors have set, in your inheritance which you will inherit in the land that the LORD your God gives you to possess. Deuteronomy 27:17 Verse Concepts: 'Cursed is he who moves his neighbor's boundary mark.' And all the people shall say, 'Amen.' Job 24:2 Verse Concepts: "Some remove the landmarks; They seize and devour flocks. Proverbs 23:10 Verse Concepts: Do not move the ancient boundary Or go into the fields of the fatherless, Hosea 5:10 Verse Concepts: The princes of Judah have become like those who move a boundary; On them I will pour out My wrath like water. Exodus 23:31 Verse Concepts: "I will fix your boundary from the Red Sea to the sea of the Philistines, and from the wilderness to the River Euphrates; for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you will drive them out before you. Judges 15:16-17 Then Samson said, "With the jawbone of a donkey, Heaps upon heaps, With the jawbone of a donkey I have killed a thousand men." When he had finished speaking, he threw the jawbone from his hand; and he named that place Ramath-lehi. Joshua 18:16 Verse Concepts: The border went down to the edge of the hill which is in the valley of Ben-hinnom, which is in the valley of Rephaim northward; and it went down to the valley of Hinnom, to the slope of the Jebusite southward, and went down to En-rogel. ==================================================================================== Survey Stones: http://boundarystones.org/view.php?stone=SW1 ==================================================================================== How the original US-Mexico border markers led to decades of fear and antipathy - documenting David Taylor's 276 monuments erected to mark the border in 1848: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/11/how-the-original-us-mexico-border-markers-led-to-decades-of-fear-and-antipathy ==================================================================================== The Surveyor’s Stone: Unearthing Hidden Markers of the American Landscape https://edgeeffects.net/surveyor-landscape/ ==================================================================================== Pinterest images of Boundary Markers https://www.pinterest.com/alanclark142/boundary-markers/ ==================================================================================== The Land Surveyor's Guide to the Supreme Court of Kansas; A Reference Text Supporting the Continuing Education of Land Surveyors 2014 https://ksls.com/Resources/Documents/Brian%20Portwood.pdf ==================================================================================== Old Deed / New Survey - Nothing is the same https://rplstoday.com/community/ask-a-surveyor/old-deed-new-survey-nothing-is-the-same/ ==================================================================================== |