Did you hear about the recent U.S. Supreme court ruling on Native
American rights to Eastern Oklahoma? I want to dig down into the ruling, but the way it is being explained thru the
press is that Eastern Oklahoma is Indian Reservation. This is worth further research as it calls into question about
the Jurisdiction of State and Federal government over this land, which in turn might further our quest for justice
regarding our perfecting of Title through non-broken chain of title to common source severance of the Sovereign, with or
without exception or reservation stipulated on the original Land patent / grants, who has privity, and the duty to honor
these grants of land and their continuing obligations of the rights accompanying those original land title conveyance...
One interesting sentence in the article: "Lawyers were also examining
whether it had broader implications for taxing, zoning and other government functions." It totally flies in the face of
those who try to claim that these ancient grants/patents have no impact on today. All who have claim to an interest in
these lands have an opportunity to do a land title search and possibly quiet title... I believe most, if not all of
Oklahoma was part of the Louisiana purchase... from France. But the Indian inhabitants had equitable right of
possession. I think that some land titles come down through the Vatican testamentary trusts; Also through the treaty of
Versailles. We have to look at Original Jurisdiction
| |